Curation Team
BENGALURU: The assembly Tuesday passed the Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Amendment) Bill, 2025, enabling municipal commissioners to regularise unlawful buildings by levying a penalty, a move that drew comparisons with the Akrama-Sakrama scheme still pending adjudication in the Supreme Court.
Piloting the bill, urban development minister BS Suresha (Byrathi) said the amendment would apply only to unlawful buildings that can be regularised under existing building bylaws or relevant Acts. “This will not apply to buildings that have been ordered for demolition,” he said.
Under the provisions, municipal commissioners can issue occupancy certificates (OCs) by levying a penalty if they had not obtained commencement certificates (CCs) before construction. A penalty can also be levied for deviations from sanctioned plan or zonal regulation limit as may be specified in the bylaws.
Suresha said the threshold for permissible building plan violations is being raised from 5% to 15%.
He recalled that in Jan 2017, the Supreme Court stayed the Akrama-Sakrama scheme, which sought to regularise unauthorised urban buildings for a fee.
“We cannot frame rules (for Akrama-Sakrama) as the matter is pending before the court. But we can regularise small sites,” he said. “We will specify the size in the rules, but it’ll be mostly 20×30 and 30×40 sites. We are exempting them from requiring CC and OC. This will help the poor and middle-class.”
He emphasised: “This is not the same Akrama-Sakrama scheme. Unlicensed properties are not being exempted from CC/OC requirement.”
Professionals to sanction plans
The bill also allows municipal corporations to empanel professional architects, engineers, structural consultants, environment consultants and town planners as ‘authorised persons’ to inspect buildings before, during and after construction, sanction building plans, and certify compliance.
“Empanelled engineers will be allowed to approve building plans up to 4,000 sq ft,” Suresha told the House.
In another key provision, the authority to sanction building plans will now rest with the commissioner or chief executive of urban local bodies (ULBs), instead of elected councils.
Opposition members objected, calling it undemocratic. But Suresha said: “We are proposing to enable the commissioner or CEO to sanction building plans, as there are instances of the council not meeting for more than six months despite the norm that they must meet once a month. The proposed bill is being brought to ensure speedy issuance of plan sanction.”
Opposition members including CN Ashwath Narayan, opposed the clause making CC and OC mandatory for electricity connections. Suresha responded: “This clause is to comply with Supreme Court’s directions.”
